<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">

<channel>
<title>GLTS Blog Description</title>
<link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/</link>
<description>GLTS Blog Description</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<generator>GLTS KnowledgeBase</generator>
<copyright>&#169;2010 Green Light Technology Solutions&#46;</copyright>
<managingEditor>support@greenlighttech.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>support@greenlighttech.net</webMaster>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>

    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2011 9:59:48 AM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Upgrading to Windows 7 is not for Everybody</title>
      <category>Trends</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?55</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=55</comments>
      <description>Recenly Microsoft announced that they will be ending support for Windows XP in August of 2014&#46;  This means that they will no longer be providing system updates for the operating system&#46;  Therefore&#44; they recommend that all users upgrade to Windows 7&#44; the most current version of the Windows operating system&#46;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;Before making the move to upgrade&#44; existing users need to examine their current hardware&#46;  For those who have PC&#39;s that are older than 5 years&#44; it may be better for them to buy new computers with Windows 7 on them&#46; After four years&#44; PC&#39;s tend to become less reliable and more unstable&#46;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;Users who are still running Windows Vista and are not experiencing freezes or blue screens should strongly consider upgrading their memory to at least 2 gigabytes&#46;  If Vista is not giving you any problems&#44; there&#39;s little reason to upgrade to Windows 7&#44; since Windows 7 is simply Windows Vista that works&#46; </description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2011 1:19:32 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>USB 3&#46;0 and Thunderbolt</title>
      <category>Trends</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?54</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=54</comments>
      <description>There are two new additions to the world of high speed interfaces&#44; USB 3&#46;0 and Thunderbolt&#46; USB 3&#46;0 &#40;developed by HP&#44; Intel&#44; and Microsoft&#41; is the latest revision of the popular Universal Serial Bus standard which dramatically increases the data transfer rates of USB 2&#46;0 from 480 mb&#47;second to 5 gigabytes&#47;second&#46;  Thunderbolt &#40;developed by Apple and Intel&#41; is another high speed connection that transfers data at a rate of 10 gigabytes&#47;second&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;USB 3&#46;0 ports are quickly being phased into the mainstream in two ways&#46;   One way is from motherboard manufacturers&#46; Although Windows 7 does not provide built&#45;in support for USB 3&#46;0&#44; it will function if drivers are installed from the motherboard&#39;s manufacturer site&#46;  Secondly&#44; USB 3&#46;0 ports are backwards compatible to USB 2&#46;0 so users do not have to buy USB 3&#46;0 devices to work with the new USB spec&#46;  Another reason why USB 3&#46;0 ports will become more popular is because since they are more high&#45;powered they are capable of charging devices faster&#46;   &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;On the other hand&#44; although Thunderbolt ports are faster&#44; it is likely they will not be used for the broad range of devices that USB 3&#46;0 is used for because the cables that work with them are very expensive &#40;$49&#41; compared to a USB 3&#46;0 cable &#40;$1&#41;&#46;  These ports will most likely be used for RAID data transfer and High Definition video&#46;  However&#44; these are very early days for these interfaces&#44; so Thunderbolt may still wind up being the most popular&#46;&#60;p&#62;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2011 10:49:17 AM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Network Accessible Storage &#40;NAS&#41; Alternative</title>
      <category>NAS</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?53</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=53</comments>
      <description>Small organizations that don&#39;t require a hosted email&#47;exchange server and need simple file sharing should simply buy a &#60;b&#62;NAS&#60;&#47;b&#62; device&#46;  These appliances offer many of the same features that can be found in a full blown Microsoft server without blowing a hole in your business&#39;s balance sheet&#46;  Some features include user access controls&#44; RAID &#40;a means of configuring redundant hard drives&#41;&#44; remote access&#44; and integration with other appliances like a UPS&#46;  Notable NAS vendors include &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;qnap&#46;com&#34;&#62;QNAP&#60;&#47;a&#62;&#44; &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;buffaotech&#46;com&#34;&#62;Buffalo&#60;&#47;a&#62;&#44; and &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;Netgear&#46;com&#34;&#62;Netgear&#60;&#47;a&#62;&#46;  </description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2006 2:04:14 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Pre&#45;N Wireless&#58;  Not Ready for Prime Time</title>
      <category>Wireless&#37;20networking</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?52</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=52</comments>
      <description>The next step in the evolution of Wireless networking is 8011&#46;N that should provide an improvement over G networks in speed and range&#46;  This specification is undergoing final ratification at the IEEE &#40;Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers&#41;&#46; In anticipation of the new spec&#44; networking manufacturers such as Belkin&#44; Linksys&#44; and Netgear have come up with some new devices that are considered &#147;draft pre&#45;N&#148;&#46;  There is no guarantee that these devices will be upgradeable to the new standard&#46;  Users may have to buy hardware complying with the N standard&#46; On the other hand&#44; the draft 1&#46;0 status of these devices should in a perfect world mean that draft&#45;n hardware could be upgradeable to the final specs via firmware updates&#46;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;After testing these devices however&#44; PC Magazine&#39;s  &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;pcmag&#46;com&#47;article2&#47;0&#44;1895&#44;1978674&#44;00&#46;asp&#34;&#62;Oliver Kaven&#60;&#47;a&#62; discovered that the pre&#45;N hardware&#39;s performance was very disappointing considering the expectations surrounding the 8011&#46;N specification&#46;  In many cases G network devices outperformed the pre&#45;N devices&#46;  In addition&#44; the pre&#45;N hardware required numerous firmware upgrades to even make them functional&#46;  Another issue that he encountered is that cross vendor compatibility was a major issue&#46;  If you absolutely require the added capabilities that N wireless networks provide&#44; buy equipment from the same manufacturers&#46;&#60;p&#62;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2006 7:58:09 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Looking Forward To Vista</title>
      <category>Trends</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?51</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=51</comments>
      <description>The hardware requirements for running the 64&#45;bit version of Windows Vista are now available on the  &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;microsoft&#46;com&#47;windowsvista&#47;getready&#47;default&#46;mspx&#34;&#62;Microsoft Website&#60;&#47;a&#62;&#46;  However&#44; a chart of hardware requirements don&#39;t provide a clear picture as to how much memory&#44; video card memory&#44; etc will provide a user with a decent computing experience&#46;  And when I mean a decent computing experience&#44; I mean one that does not include frequent freeze&#45;ups&#44; windows that open quickly &#40;the &#147;snap factor&#148; as you will&#41;&#44; and a PC that is not working slower than you are&#46;   &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;In the newest version of Windows&#44; Microsoft tries to remedy this problem by providing you with different rating levels that indicate whether a PC&#39;s present configuration by providing a user with a measurement designated as the &#147;Windows System Performance Rating&#148;&#46;  The rating system rates the individual parts of a PC &#40;video&#44; processor&#44; memory etc&#41; and then provides a composite score&#46; So for example&#44; if a computer&#39;s hardware does not totally provide the best performance for Microsoft Vista&#44; the composite rating will go down to a &#147;1&#148;&#46;  Whereas if a computer&#39;s hardware is the most optimum for Vista&#44; the rating will go up to a &#147;5&#148;&#46;  What this rating system attempts to do is remedy the &#147;you don&#39;t know what you&#39;re missing syndrome&#148; that many users experience with previous versions of Windows&#46;  This new tool prevents a user from not realizing that their PC&#39;s sluggishness is due to not running with enough memory and not due to an inherent problem with Windows&#46;  &#60;p&#62; &#60;p&#62;The only problem with this rating system is that you can only access it with a working version of Windows Vista&#46;  What if you are currently using XP or older and you need to know whether your current system will support Vista&#63;  Fortunately Microsoft has provided a downloadable &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;microsoft&#46;com&#47;windowsvista&#47;getready&#47;upgradeadvisor&#47;default&#46;mspx&#34;&#62;tool&#60;&#47;a&#62; to evaluate your current configuration which will inform you as to what needs to be upgraded&#46;  This tool will also inform you as to what different aspects of Vista are supported by your current configuration such as the Aero interface&#46;&#60;p&#62; </description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2005 7:58:32 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Why Do You Need a Firewall&#63;</title>
      <category>Firewalls</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?50</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=50</comments>
      <description>Every computer that is connected to the Internet has hundreds of virtual interfaces that allow programs to communicate with it called &#147;ports&#148;&#46;  If you have ever seen The Matrix Reloaded&#44; they can be best thought of as the mysterious &#147;back doors&#148; between different places within the Matrix&#46;   An unprotected computer has these ports exposed to the Internet&#46;  Therefore&#44; to prevent a rogue computer from accessing your computer&#44; you can install a firewall to prevent your computer from being accessed from these ports by either closing them&#44; or hiding them altogether&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;In addition&#44; PCs have within them invasive tools&#44; such as Telnet&#44; that allow outsiders to log in remotely and perform tasks on your machine&#46;  A firewall prevents these tools from being accessed remotely by blocking these requests before they reach the network&#46;    &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;A newer method that some firewalls use to protect computers is &#147;stateful packet inspection&#148;&#46;  This method is generally found on firewall appliances that are used to protect entire networks&#46;  What this method does is inspect incoming data packets and compare them with a database of acceptable characteristics such as origin&#44; source&#44; etc&#46;  The ones that are acceptable are allowed whereas the ones that are discarded&#46;    &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;Computers with Windows XP service pack 2 have an adequate firewall that blocks most traffic headed inbound into a PC&#46;  However&#44; it does not block malicious programs that may be trying to send a payload from within a computer&#46;  Therefore&#44; it is often better to purchase a third party firewall like one developed by Zone Labs&#44; or Symantec&#46;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;A firewall can also be used to block out Internet traffic that is harmful to children or non&#45;work related by analyzing the data packets and looking for terms such as &#147;x&#45;rated&#148; or &#147;boobies&#148;&#46;  Symantec&#39;s Norton Internet Security comes with some very good child protection&#46;&#60;p&#62;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jul 2005 11:32:18 AM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Eliminating Spy&#45;ware&#58;  Solutions and Imposters</title>
      <category>Spyware</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?49</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=49</comments>
      <description>A scourge that has plagued all computer users at one time or another is spy&#45;ware&#46;  Spy&#45;ware can be relatively harmless&#44; like a tracking cookie&#44; or it can be a major nuisance like the infamous &#147;Cool Web Search&#148; spy&#45;ware&#46;  If you haven&#39;t had the misfortune of being infected by CWS&#44; this bug hijacks your browser and forces it to open to default website called &#147;Cool Web Search&#148;&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;Once a computer is infected with the more troublesome variety&#44; how can you remove them from your system&#63;  Not too long ago the prevailing wisdom was to download a version of Lavasoft&#39;s Ad&#45;Aware&#44; or Spybot Search and Destroy&#46;  Unfortunately&#44; like an evil plague&#44; spy&#45;ware has managed to evolve beyond those solutions to become more removal resistant&#46;  One solution used to track these miscreant programs down is the HiJack This&#33; Utility which gives you a list of all the processes running on your computer&#46;  Unfortunately when using this program&#44; it takes some technical sophistication to determining which programs are not legitimate&#46;  To really get to the root of the problem you either have to call a qualified technician or submit the output to a &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;spywarewarrior&#46;com&#47;viewforum&#46;php&#63;f&#61;5&#34;&#62;website&#60;&#47;a&#62; for other more seasoned users to give you a diagnosis&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;For users who don&#39;t have the time to wade through arcane technical output and would rather spend time with their families&#44; there are programs that can knock out a lot of the more troublesome spy&#45;ware&#46;  Better solutions that have entered or evolved onto the scene are &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;webroot&#46;com&#47;&#34;&#62;Webroot&#39;s&#60;&#47;a&#62; Spy&#45;sweeper and &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;sunbeltsoftware&#46;com&#47;&#34;&#62;Sunbelt&#39;s&#60;&#47;a&#62; CounterSpy&#46;  Microsoft also has an evolving beta spyware removal program that they have been improving since they bought Giant software&#46;  By the way&#44; beta means that the software is still in its trial phase&#46; Nevertheless&#44; the Microsoft tool still seems to be a pretty effective removal tool&#46;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;But what about those programs that are advertised by pop&#45;ups as you surf around the Internet&#63;  The ones that tell you to download x program to remove spy&#45;ware now&#63;  There are a lot of good free programs on the Internet&#46; However&#44; the ones that are advertised by pop&#45;ups are not in that class&#46;  Those programs will actually pollute your machine with more ads and spy&#45;ware leaving you worse off than you were before&#46; &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;i&#62;For Internet Marketing Advice go to Linda Carlisle&#39;s Blog at this link&#58;  &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;themarketingdepartment&#46;blogspot&#46;com&#47;&#34;&#62;http&#58;&#47;&#47;themarketingdepartment&#46;blogspot&#46;com&#47;&#60;&#47;a&#62;&#60;&#47;i&#62; </description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2005 5:44:05 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Trouble With WEP</title>
      <category>Wireless&#37;20networking</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?48</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=48</comments>
      <description>At its inception&#44; WEP&#40;&#147;wired equivalent privacy&#148;&#41;  had been maligned by the press for being a flawed wireless encryption solution&#46;  This was not helped by the fact that there was a less than impressive&#44; well publicized demonstration of the then new standard&#46;  However&#44; this has not stopped many users from using WEP as the &#34;password&#34; to their wireless network&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;The reality of the state of WEP is that using existing technology&#44; patient &#147;war drivers&#148;&#40;wireless network crackers&#41; can defeat its encryption&#46;  Data that is transmitted wirelessly is done so in embedded frames within packets&#46;  Under the WEP standard&#44; each frame is encrypted&#44; or hidden by a string of pseudorandom numbers called a keystream&#46; &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;The problem is that the pseudorandom numbers are generated with a 24&#45;bit random number seed called an initialization vector &#40;IV&#41;&#46;  This number seed is transmitted with every encrypted frame unencrypted&#46;  Therefore&#44; a cracker can look at two encrypted frames and know whether they were encrypted with the same IV&#46;  To make cracking the code more difficult&#44; each frame is transmitted with a different IV&#46;  The problem is that there are only 16&#44;777&#44;216 different IV values&#46;  If you use a Wireless B network&#44; these values can be exhausted after six hours since it transmits data at 11 megabytes per second&#44; or even in less time if you are using a Wireless G network&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;You would think that six hours would be a long time to crack a key&#44; but WEP has a complication&#44; &#147;weak IVs&#148;&#46;  By a mathematical quirk&#44; 2&#37; of those 16&#44;777&#44;216 IV values turn traitor and leak a little information about the data they encrypt&#46;&#60;p&#62;As a result&#44; password cracker utilities like AirSnort can be used to find enough &#147;weak&#148; IV values until it has enough to crack the WEP key&#46;&#60;p&#62; &#60;p&#62;So what is the alternative&#63;  The best solution to this problem is to use the more current WPA standard&#46; WPA doubles the size of the initialization vector from 24 to 48 bits&#46;  Under WPA&#44; a network can pass 281 trillion packets before the pool of unique IVs is exhausted&#46;  This would take about a thousand years&#46;  Furthermore&#44; WPA changes keys often enough so that it is impossible for a cracker to gather enough &#147;traitor packets&#148; to reverse&#45;engineer a key&#46;    &#60;p&#62;  &#60;p&#62;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 4:26:58 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Wed, 25 May 2005 4:26:58 PM</title>
      <category>Specials</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?46</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=46</comments>
      <description>&#60;b&#62;Green Light Technical Services&#58;  &#147;Upgrade Your Summer&#148; Special&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;There is no time like the summer for upgrading and putting your computer resources in order because for many small businesses this is an off peak period&#46;  That is why for the Month of June 2005&#44; all services for all customers will be free for the first hour&#44; provided that the job takes a minimum of three hours&#46;  Furthermore&#44; services that take less than two hours to complete will be discounted 20&#37;&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;If you have been putting off installing Windows XP service pack 2 or reinstalling your operating system&#44; this is the time to do it&#33;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 2:54:27 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>GLTS Testimonial &#45; Logos Bookstore</title>
      <category>Testimonials</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?45</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=45</comments>
      <description>&#60;b&#62;Green Light Technical Services Testimonial&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;i&#62;&#34;Green Light is our own tech resource&#33;  They have provided personal computer consulting for both my family computer as well as my business system&#46;  GLTS brings expertise and competence every time he comes to fix a problem&#44; responding rapidly to any technology emergency we might have&#46;  They also proactively suggest updates and preventative action which has certainly reduced the number of those emergencies&#46;  I highly recommend GLTS and their services&#46;&#34;&#60;&#47;i&#62;&#60;p&#62; &#60;p&#62;&#60;b&#62;Tammy Daugherty&#45;Holzer&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;b&#62;Logos Bookstore&#44; Oak Park&#44; IL&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 2:40:35 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>GLTS Testimonial &#45; Instant Tax Service</title>
      <category>Testimonials</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?44</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=44</comments>
      <description>&#60;b&#62;Green Light Technical Services Testimonial&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;i&#62;&#34;Michael was on call for us&#46;  Being a VERY SMALL business its nice to&#60;p&#62;know that you have an extra staff member in Michael&#44; his customer&#60;p&#62;service skills were outstanding and he kept our computers fresh and running&#46;&#34;&#60;&#47;i&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;b&#62;Seth Feldman&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;Instant Tax Service</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 5:07:55 PM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>GLTS Testimonial &#45; Huget Marketing and Advertising</title>
      <category>Testimonials</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?43</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=43</comments>
      <description>&#60;b&#62;Green Light Technical Services Testimonial&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;i&#62;&#147;Michael upgraded our network environment quickly and efficiently allowing us to focus on what we do best&#46;&#148;&#60;&#47;i&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;b&#62;Mike Samec&#60;&#47;b&#62;&#60;p&#62;Huget Marketing and Advertising &#60;p&#62;</description>
    </item>


    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 9:42:52 AM GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Dawn of 64&#45;Bit Computing</title>
      <category>Trends</category>
      <link>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/ViewItem.asp?42</link>
      <comments>http://www.greenlighttech.net/blog/Comments.asp?Entry=42</comments>
      <description>The next revolution in computer technology is the transition from 32&#45;bit to 64&#45;bit computing&#46;  Not only does this transition signal a new processor architecture&#44; it also means that the amount of data that your CPU can process in a clock cycle will double&#46;  If you think your computers are fast now&#44; wait until 64&#45;bit computing hits full stride&#46; The major processor manufacturers are already selling 64&#45;bit ready computer processors&#46;  But to really achieve 64&#45; bit computing&#44; a 64&#45;bit operating system has to be developed&#46;  Just   &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;pcmag&#46;com&#47;article2&#47;0&#44;1759&#44;1790236&#44;00&#46;asp&#34;&#62;recently&#60;&#47;a&#62;&#44; Microsoft has released Windows XP x64 edition&#46;   Furthermore&#44; all the major applications will need to be re&#45;written to a version that takes advantage of the new 64&#45;bit computing features&#46;&#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;What does this mean to the average business user&#63;  It doesn&#39;t render all pre 64 bit computers useless&#46;  Win XP x64 edition will be compatible with most current 32&#45;bit applications&#46;  However&#44; many devices won&#39;t be compatible with the 64&#45;bit operating system because they will require 64&#45;bit compatible drivers&#46;  Users should expect a short period after the introduction where no device drivers exist for many different pieces of hardware &#40;video cards&#44; printers&#44; sound cards&#44; etc&#41;&#44; much like the period after XP was first introduced&#46;  Many  &#60;a href&#61;&#34;http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;intel&#46;com&#47;products&#47;processor&#47;pentium4&#47;index&#46;htm&#34;&#62;Pentium 4&#60;&#47;a&#62; machines can already support 64&#45;bit processor instructions&#46;  &#60;p&#62;&#60;p&#62;If many of you believe that this upgrade means that the old Windows XP is totally obsolete&#44; that is not really the case&#46;  The increase in speed from Windows XP x64 will definitely benefit users in video and graphics fields&#46;  For other users who rely on their PC for accounting or word processing&#44; they would benefit the most from the upgrade only if they were using pre&#45;Pentium 4 machines&#46;  In addition&#44; devices are still going to be shipped with drivers for Windows XP&#46;  That&#39;s not surprising considering that many devices still ship with drivers for Windows 95&#46;&#60;p&#62; </description>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>
